Subeta: Dragarth Makeover

For posting new and revamped pet colours on Subeta.
User avatar
Twofold Black
Posts: 774
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 06:40 am
Gender: Male
Location: Porn
Contact:

Post by Twofold Black » 09 May 2007 02:09 pm

Wow, I think this is the first time I've liked an <i>obviously superior</i> revamp of a pet I kind of hated before <i>significantly less</i> than the original. The body of this Dragarth is nice, but I feel like the proportions of the head are wrong -- the big horns worked before, now they don't -- and I absolutely loathe the expression.
Image

User avatar
Chandi
Posts: 225
Joined: 20 Jan 2006 06:18 pm
Gender: Female

Post by Chandi » 09 May 2007 02:15 pm

It doesn't squick me one way or the other, I've never been a huge fan. I really like the furriness, some of the obviously furry creatures don't look as furry (and should). I'm just a little sad it lost it's scowl/smirk/whatever type of expression it had going on. Oh well. Pretty.

User avatar
hebdenhippy
Posts: 640
Joined: 14 Apr 2007 10:18 pm
Gender: Female
Human Avatar: 235278
Location: UK
Contact:

ew!

Post by hebdenhippy » 09 May 2007 04:33 pm

Ew! I loved the old Dragarths, they were my favourite pets, these new ones are uglified and the hair is way to poofy, I hope they havn't changed the Spectrum Dragarth, they are the nicest pets on the site in my opinion, i was going to get one

User avatar
Symmie
Posts: 89
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 08:06 am
Contact:

Post by Symmie » 09 May 2007 05:36 pm

That's gross. That person seriously doesn't know how to shade. The face is like, "OMGGG ANIME KAWAII^__^^ HUEG SPARKLE EYES."
^ MY COMMENTS ARE MATURE.

I just love how they never make polls when they're about to revamp a pet anymore.
ImageImage

User avatar
Keith
Posts: 356
Joined: 12 Oct 2006 04:44 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Post by Keith » 09 May 2007 06:05 pm

Symmie wrote:That's gross. That person seriously doesn't know how to shade. The face is like, "OMGGG ANIME KAWAII^__^^ HUEG SPARKLE EYES."
^ MY COMMENTS ARE MATURE.

I just love how they never make polls when they're about to revamp a pet anymore.
Uh... what?

This is the first pet in like, a year, that we haven't polled before revamping. Name another, please.

(And not a recolor of a revamped pet.)

checkers
Posts: 689
Joined: 29 Oct 2006 09:34 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Post by checkers » 09 May 2007 06:14 pm

Keith wrote:
Symmie wrote:That's gross. That person seriously doesn't know how to shade. The face is like, "OMGGG ANIME KAWAII^__^^ HUEG SPARKLE EYES."
^ MY COMMENTS ARE MATURE.

I just love how they never make polls when they're about to revamp a pet anymore.
Uh... what?

This is the first pet in like, a year, that we haven't polled before revamping. Name another, please.

(And not a recolor of a revamped pet.)
I wouldn't take notice, I think that it is a very good improvment, even though it really just looks like an Eye style change, I still think that this is better.
I would prefer the Torrents old posed colours like Angelic, Bloodred and Reborn to be improved more, like NyauNyau's Torrent XD

User avatar
Jessi
Posts: 3412
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 06:29 pm
Gender: Female
Human Avatar: 155904
Location: Seattle, Washington
Contact:

Post by Jessi » 09 May 2007 06:21 pm

Keith wrote: Uh... what?

This is the first pet in like, a year, that we haven't polled before revamping. Name another, please.

(And not a recolor of a revamped pet.)
Well ^_^; The Cadogre, Endeavor, Torrent, and Escalade, to name a few xD (Although those ones, I doubt many people would have voted against xD)

User avatar
Dollfie
Posts: 100
Joined: 31 Mar 2007 10:55 am
Gender: Female
Human Avatar: 227963

Post by Dollfie » 09 May 2007 06:33 pm

I like the revamp personally but then again I don't own one and do not plan on it. I think it's a vast improvement. The features on it look much more realistic* and it just looks less stylized. Which is a good thing if these are pets** and not just adoptable pieces of art.

* yes I know they aren't real XP
** technically they are adoptable pices of art... but... you know what I mean

User avatar
Wingsrising
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Jan 2006 09:31 pm
Gender: Female
Human Avatar: 157670
Location: Iowa, USA, trying to stay warm

Post by Wingsrising » 09 May 2007 06:37 pm

Having now seen the old art, I like the new *art* much better but I think the cheerful look is quite a large personality change from the old version.
Image

User avatar
Armi
Posts: 121
Joined: 19 Jan 2006 08:57 pm
Location: Digging up graves
Contact:

Post by Armi » 09 May 2007 06:50 pm

Man, they made the Dragarth into a girl...least I just get a girly vibe from it now. *sighs* I knew they they'd have to get revamped sooner or later cause it was TOO cartoony.
Man, I just can't keep a cartoon pet on this site.

I'm assuming Bloodred wasn't revamped yet right? Cause mine's looking the same...man, I hope another artist draws the revamped version. I'm sorry, but I don't like the new look, but I don't mean to offend the artist that drew it. I just don't like it. =/
The galatic one looked cool,but this one...bah!

Bah at everyone wanting realitic pets here...I wanted cartoony pets.
Yeah, I'm pretty sad right now about this.

EDIT: Ok, one perk I found...I like the new wings.
ImageImage
"Enta, my castle fell again...fix it, kay?" - Laharl

User avatar
Goldenchaos
Posts: 1105
Joined: 29 Nov 2006 11:17 pm
Location: Hall of Origin

Post by Goldenchaos » 09 May 2007 07:39 pm

I swear I didnt know the Dragarth had hair and fur. D:

I love the wings.
Image Image
ImageImage

User avatar
Fish
Posts: 93
Joined: 07 Jan 2006 09:24 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Post by Fish » 09 May 2007 07:43 pm

The little smile makes me want to tilt my head. It looks FUNNY.

And the squared-off forefoot. But it's nice.
<B>highly</b>FLAMMABLE<I>animal</i>
<a href="http://subeta.org/userinfo.php?user=158800">See: Feezl</a>

User avatar
Armi
Posts: 121
Joined: 19 Jan 2006 08:57 pm
Location: Digging up graves
Contact:

Post by Armi » 09 May 2007 08:38 pm

Ok, I've calmed down now cause I had just woke up and saw the revamp, so yeah, morning/afternoon anger.

Really, I just hate the head. The body IS good, but the head is what bothered me. Heh, guess I was overracting...still they need a hair cut or just give them back their grin. It's just like the Demi revamp, first time, killing what made them so great...expression. Even if the anatomy was "bad".

Yep, Dragarths are furry dragons. =3 I really liked that combo, I do like that it is more noticable cause the old one kinda didn't show it strongly, namly the shading the lack of fur details past the chest and head.

This got me wondering though, this won't be revamped right?
Image
*holds Paradoxically close* :( It's techincally, a Dragarth.

Man, I sound differently from my last post. I was cranky.
Mattering how Bloodred comes out, I'll either keep or consider Galactic...heck, reborn Dragarth does need a revamp, I hope it's good. Hope spectrum isn't changed though.
ImageImage
"Enta, my castle fell again...fix it, kay?" - Laharl

checkers
Posts: 689
Joined: 29 Oct 2006 09:34 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Post by checkers » 09 May 2007 08:54 pm

Armi wrote:This got me wondering though, this won't be revamped right?
Image
*holds Paradoxically close* :( It's techincally, a Dragarth.
I always thought it was a Dragarth, but I thought I must've been insane, but then when you posted that you made me think back to what I originally thought.
Image
I also thought that this was a Dillema, but I thought it might not be, whereas the other one look soo much like a Dragarth.

User avatar
ChibiDragon86
Posts: 86
Joined: 04 Feb 2006 11:12 pm
Location: Somewhere else!!!!!!!
Contact:

Post by ChibiDragon86 » 09 May 2007 10:44 pm

Well the new Dragarth isn't that bad it's kinda nice. Though will say the smile is a little odd but there is a reason for it. Seems a lot of users didn't see Debilee's post either that or ignored it.

Quoted from the dragarth new post.
Posted by DebiLee

The smirk didn't look right on the face, so it was changed. Pet revamps are not polled if Keith determines that they need not be, which was the case in this instance, as it is a vast improvement over the former one, and, had it been polled, this is the version that would have won and been added, so there really would have been no point to a poll.
~ Chibi
Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest