That's your fault then. You can be anti-car, anti-pwushie, anti-any-other-object for all I care. But denying people the right to own what they want on "moral" grounds, personal preference, or other baseless reasons is wrong.
That is the meaning behind molon labe.
I could say that gays are disgusting and amoral (for no reason in particular other than indoctrination and misguided personal preference) and try to back those beliefs with leviticus (while simultaneously eating pork and shellfish and beating up my menstruating wife, and refusing to shit in a hole in the ground and cover it over with a paddle, or to shut myself away for 2 weeks every time I get sick), but bigoted views don't make it objectively "right" to ban gay marriage.
I could say cars are deadly and cause untold amounts of pollution and kill thousands of people (actually, my biological father was killed in a car accident, and I absolutely hate driving, so I personally have a good reason for that one). But that doesn't mean responsible car ownership should be illegal.
I suggest reading this guy's page on the
real origins of gun control in America.
http://www.blackmanwithagun.com/site/db ... =140000845 (browse through here while you're at it
http://www.gunfacts.info/pdfs/gun-facts ... Screen.pdf )
Though the origins of gun control in Britain are less complex. They ran out of colonies to oppress, and so turned on themselves.
England: No more guns for colonists!
George Washington: GET OUT!
England: Brown people are not permitted to own guns!
Mahatma Gandhi:
I don't like food anymore! ("Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest." - Mahatma Gandhi)
Etc.
Oh, well. I really hope both me and my boyfriend can find a job in Vermont. There really ain't anywhere else worth livin' for
gun-toting gays.